Superior Court, the Court summarized what constitutes quid pro quo sexual harassment, stating: A cause of action for quid pro quo sexual harassment involves the most commonly considered conduct sexual harassment, including for example, sexual advances, unwarranted explicit discussions of sexual acts, and comments about the employee's body and sexual uses that may be done. To establish cause of action under this theory, it is sufficient to argue that a period of employment was expressly or implicitly conditioned on acceptance of a supervisor's unwanted sexual advances” (Timothy Broderick & Katrina Saleen, 2008). This case is relative to Debbie's situation, as; offering sexual advances with the supervisor preposition makes an employee's sexual conduct a condition of employment benefits or