To listen to a clickIn one year could money and lives be safe? Or have we realized everything that could have happened? This goes hand in hand with the discussion about whether or not to use seat belts in the car. This is a widely discussed topic because of the consequences, good or bad, of seat belts in the car. The consequences could be life-threatening for the driver and anyone in the car, or other drivers believe they feel more comfortable without a belt around them. These different points of view are obviously topics to discuss. In 2001, the debate began when the Supreme Court ruled to allow police to arrest people for not wearing seat belts. Furthermore, a 20-year-old man, living in New York, was fighting a ticket he received for wearing seat belts. of the seat belt. The justice system lost the case, causing his license to be revoked and he was arrested, forced to spend time on central booking. This goes hand in hand with the possibility of the police arresting you for not wearing a seat belt, as the saying goes “Click or Ticket”. There are many different views on seat belts, however, two of the most popular ones to consider are that seat belts are beneficial to wear and seat belts are not beneficial to wear in the car. Both perspectives of this problem have ideas related to traffic accidents, human safety and costs. Barriers to Accidents One problem with accidents is that some people believe seat belts cause accidents while others think they prevent accidents. Create a debate about how accidents happen. People who believe accidents are caused by seat belts say that when the driver wears the seat belt he feels as if he can't move, forcing him to drive at high speeds and change lanes quickly. This results in accidents and also... middle of paper......and the seat belt problem. Some people like to say that seat belts are not useful and do not help, but arguing against this other people think they are useful. Both of these parties have totally different opinions. However, some can't help but wonder if they won't always agree. On the other hand, one side might realize the other side's point by not provoking more debate on this topic. Looking further out in time it is possible for people to become neutral and have the point of view of both opposing sides. Furthermore, society could change if things went one way or the other. Some people may feel like their freedom is being invaded, while others may feel safer on the road with a decrease in the number of reckless drivers. Furthermore, as society leans more and more to one side, the country will be divided and will never reach a compromise?