In modern times, information is very easy to obtain. It is different if we compare it with the previous age. Today, thanks to the Internet, we can obtain information wherever and whenever we want. The Internet provides free-flowing data and information that we can see. Users can find any information they want, such as information about a car, information on how to cook a certain dish, information about education, etc. Thanks to the Internet they can almost find anything without any limitation. Although you can access the Internet from anywhere at any time, the Internet is open to everyone, however, some countries have decided to ban or censor some resources on the Internet. “The reasons why they limited access are varied, starting from the content being bad, the content being copyrighted, the government not wanting citizens to see the content, etc.” Internet censorship may seem like a good thing, but it is actually a bad idea because it has a very negative impact on Internet users in many forms. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayAt this time, with the help of the Internet, we can search for all the information we want. A study of young pupils revealed that approximately 97% of students had obtained information via the Internet rather than using the library (Aktay 2018). From the research we can say that most students use the Internet to study rather than going to the library because it is more convenient. If the government limits access to the Internet, it will directly impact students because most of them use the Internet to find materials and sources to study and limiting access would mean limiting students' ability to improve or learn new things and this would likely impact the quality of education in the country itself. Government censorship forced users to use VPNs or other similar tools to bypass technical censorship filters (2017). The main purpose of censorship is to block access to a certain website, but it also encourages users to use another alternative to bypass the censored website by using a VPN. The government's effort in blocking some certain websites is deemed useless and the money invested in the censorship project will be wasted because what is the purpose of censorship if users can bypass the censorship system. A real-life example of Internet censorship is Article 13 published by the EU. So what is Article 13 and what impact does it have on the Internet? Article 13 is the part of the new EU Copyright Directive that regulates how to deal with copyrighted online content such as films, television, games and songs (Fox 2019). From the definition we can say that Article 13 is a law aimed at limiting the sharing of copyrighted content on the Internet. Article 13 requires online platforms to filter or remove copyrighted material from their websites. What Article 13 seeks is to remove all copyrighted material from a website that poses a problem for a website that relies on user-generated content such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and so on. Something like that is a problem because Article 13 can kill the Internet yes. Most of the content you post on social media could be images such as memes, links, and videos. With Article 13 in place, people cannot freely share images as memes in social media, memes are intended for entertainment or humor purposes for Internet users. If users are not allowed to share memes, it means that it is not allowedhave fun on the Internet. Furthermore, memes can be used for satire and criticism, and if they are banned it is equivalent to limiting users' freedom of speech. In addition to sharing images, another website that relies on user-generated content like Twitch is also in trouble. Video game content belongs to the game developer and publisher, so streamers and platforms could potentially be held liable for copyright violations under Article 13 by streaming or uploading gameplay videos without permission. People on Twitch usually live stream gameplay, and the game is copyrighted content. If Article 13 is in force, the streamer is committing a crime and will ultimately lose their job while Twitch will lose a user who generates content. It can impact streamers' careers and Twitch's business and this would be very bad for both the streamer and Twitch. In addition to Article 13 created by the EU, North Korea also restricts access to the Internet, but it is even worse than Article 13. Ordinary citizens of North Korea do not have access to the Internet, the privilege of accessing the Internet it is left to a select number in the country, known as the elite, as well as some academics and scientists (Lee 2012). It seems terrible that ordinary citizens cannot access the Internet and citizens will never know about the credibility of the information received, they can be deceived by the government with false information or even manipulated with false information and for the rest of their lives they will never know the truth . Even the ordinary citizen will have difficulty interacting with people outside their country because they do not have the privilege of accessing the Internet. North Korea has developed its own devices such as smartphones, tablets and software, including Red Star 3.0, an operating system that imitates IOS and these products have been carefully designed to control and monitor user information, Red Star 3.0 has surveillance capabilities and the intranet interface, Kwangmyong, is set up to give the impression that the user has full access to the Internet. An analysis of Red Star's capabilities by the technology-focused newspaper Fast Company found that its approximately 5,000 web pages contain mostly propaganda (Jerreat 2017). To limit interaction with the outside world, North Korea created its own devices, the problem is that these devices are designed to monitor users. Even with a communication device, citizens cannot have their private time when using it because the government constantly monitors them and it seems that they are not allowed to have a private moment when using the devices. In addition to the devices, North Korea's web pages are made up of propaganda that can be harmful to citizens. Imagine if a child in North Korea surfs the internet and the only thing he can find is propaganda. The child will be brainwashed by propaganda and this will affect his mentality and can directly influence the future of the child. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Some people disagree about internet censorship but there are some people who agree. Most people agree because on the Internet you can search for anything such as education, news, pirated software and even porn and it is very easy for children to find porn on the Internet. The Digital Economy Act was launched largely in the wake of an NSPCC report that found more than half of children and teenagers who ended up watching porn "stumbled across" it on.