The grandfather paradox is often misrepresented in literary and cinematic works. However, in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, the paradox is portrayed quite well with only a few errors. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The grandfather paradox is commonly known as the myth of killing one's grandparents to prevent one's birth. This time travel paradox originates around the Great Depression and appeared in early works such as “Nathaniel Scachner's Ancestral Voices and Rene Barjavel's Future Times Three” (Grandfather Paradox 1). However, this paradox is not necessarily based on eliminating the possibility of a person's existence by killing his source of life. Rather, it is about doing something when they travel back to the past that would prevent their future self from going back (Krasnikov 6). There are two main arguments for and against time travel that are important when considering this paradox. Argument one is against the idea of ​​time travel and argument while argument two is for it. The reconstruction of the argument follows: If time travel were possible, then a time traveler could change the events of the past. If a time traveler could change the events of the past, then the time traveler could create contradictory states of affairs. It is not possible for anyone to create contradictory states of affairs. Time travel is impossible. This argument supports random determinism, or the idea that there is only one timeline. This too must respect the events of the past and the laws of nature. This would be in line with the first premise of the argument that the traveler cannot change the past. Argument two, however, argues the opposite. Argument number two: There are two different senses of the word "may" or "possible" If this is true, then there is a misunderstanding in NTT (premise 1 is false) Time travel is possible, and it is not true that once the traveler can change the events of the past. This argument supports random indeterminism, or the idea of ​​multiple timelines. It is based on the first argument with the words “may and possible”. An example would be like riding a bicycle. I know how to ride a bicycle, which means I know how to ride a bicycle and I have performed this action. The other refers to your ability to learn this action, but you have not yet performed it. This small difference causes the two different arguments that are key to understanding time travel paradoxes. Time travel stories using this paradox are quite common in modern literature as well as modern films. A grandfather paradox situation is present in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. This is the third film in the Harry Potter series. The story begins with the escape of a very dangerous criminal from a maximum security prison. The prisoner Sirius Black, happens to be the godfather of the main character, Harry, who doesn't know it. With his escape, many are incredibly scared that he might try to track Harry down at their school, Hogwarts. While there, the headmaster gives Harry's best friend, Hermione, a change in time. This time Turner allowed her to be in two places at once so she could take multiple classes at once. He can then attend one class, then travel back the same time and take another class. This however raises questions about the brain's ability to have memories from the same point in time. As the plot progresses, Harry discovers that Sirius is his godfather and will come to talk to him at Hogwarts. DuringThis time, the school gardener Hagrid is about to have one of his pets executed because it hurt a student. When they think of witnessing the execution, they are mortified and shocked because they believed the execution was unjust. Later in the film, Harry and Hermione use the time turner to go back before the execution to try to prevent the death of Buckbeak, his pet. They sneak behind some giant pumpkins to hide from the executioner. They then lure the creature towards them and take it into the woods to free it from its impending death. This personifies the core of the grandfather paradox, traveling back in time to prevent an action from being done. In this particular case, instead of killing their grandparents to avoid their own death, they have to go back to save the animal. Therefore, it is more of a vicious circle than a direct reference to the Grandfather Paradox. As they proceed through the forest, they see their current selves, the ones being observed by the time travelers. They don't want to be seen otherwise they interrupt time. They are able to evade themselves, for now. They eventually reach a clearing where they can rest. In the clearing, Harry can see him and his Godfather being attacked by Dementors, who suck away his soul until he dies. Harry knows he must take action to save his current self's life, but weighs the consequences of interrupting time. He decides that he must save himself so he can be where he currently is, by traveling through time. This is another example of the grandfather paradox in this film. As in many films and novels, there are problems with the way paradoxes are used and depicted. Each instance of the paradox can be evaluated slightly differently, so each can be considered a separate instance. The first example is when Hermione rigorously uses the time turner to go back in time so she can take lessons and be in multiple places at once. While doing so, he would effectively be attending two places at once. This would essentially create a timeline with little loops where the original timeline is changed. However, what the film doesn't take into account is that Hermione will create a different version of herself in each timeline. One cannot simply learn in two places at once and retain knowledge as one being. Even if you include the Lewis system with small cycles on a single timeline, multiple memories coexisting at the same time may not be physically possible. It is difficult to know for sure, as this technology is not available to test this thesis. Also, I would only agree with you about keeping both memories if it was a multiple timeline system. If the timeline has loops like strands of DNA, then I believe one memory should replace another. However, some might argue that it is also possible and very plausible that Hermione actually has a different internal clock than physical time ticks by. around her. This would offer a solution to the brain's ability to have multiple memories at once, because its time does not align with that of the universe. I would agree, as this only seems plausible to her. On the other hand, it would raise more questions than answers. For example, if others went back with her, which happens later, would they also have a different personal time system? Furthermore, because the technology does not exist to test either theory, it is difficult to reach a definitive conclusion. The second case involving apparent execution falls more within the accepted uses and applications of the Grandfather Paradox and time travel. While they are in the guardian's house,.