IntroductionThe Orange Revolution was presented as a series that invented protests and political events that happened in Ukraine from the end of November 2004 until January 2005. This happened after the rush outside the vote in 2004 for the presidential elections. It has been claimed that the Ukrainian presidential election was affected by corruption, voter fraud, and voter intimidation of those who voted for the opposition (Arel, 168). Ukraine's capital, Kiev, was the main focal point where the movement took root for civil resistance. Thousands of protesters and activists were roaming around and holding their rallies every day. There was a national revolution by democrats, characterized by a series of civil disobedience actions, general strikes and sit-ins. All these activities were organized by the opposition movement in an attempt to assert their voices and opinions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The protests were challenged by the news that was made by the various reports that emerged from the indicators and monitoring of the domestic and foreign elections that were spread among the public believing that the results of the runoff were rigged. The run-off was due to take place on 21 November 2004 and the candidates running were Viktor Yushchenko and Victor Yanukovych and Viktor Yanukovych was declared the winner of the hotly contested seat. The new protests intensified when the results of the initial runoff were announced and the Supreme Court of Ukraine ordered a new vote on December 26, 2004 (Kuzio, Taras 253). All this was subjected to careful scrutiny, conducted by international observers and national electoral experts. The second ballot was heralded as true and fair (Kissinger, Henry 88). The final results showed a clear picture of how Yushchenko won with 52% over his rival Yanukyoch, whose rating was at 44%. It marked the end of the Orange Revolution as, after the winner was proclaimed, the inauguration ceremony took place on January 23, 2005 in the nation's capital. In the following years the Orange Revolution had a negative outlook in the federal circles of Belarus and also Russia. Yanukovych was declared the winner of the presidential elections held in 2010. This was after the Central Election Commission and a committee of international observers reported and declared that the presidential elections were held fairly (Arel, 168). It is important to note that Yanukovych was ousted from power after four years, when the first European clashes occurred in the nation's capital, Kiev Independence Square, in February 2014. These results resulted in the death of many protesters and activists, resulting in more than 100 casualties that occurred between February 20 and 20. Research questions used to determine the study include, what were the impacts of the Orange movement and what did they do? achieve in their daily struggle? There were changes in political bodies, parties, political institutions, leaders and regional political orientations that occurred in Ukraine after the Orange Revolution. If there had been, would the changes have been evolutionary or revolutionary? What were the impacts of the changes necessary for the fight for democracy in Ukraine? The political reform came into implementation after the 2006 elections and was applied by parliament (Kuzio, Taras 238). This was the result of compromise between the Orange leaders and the Orange Party of the National Congress. He had aimpact on the country since it changed from a presidential-parliamentary republic to a presidential-parliamentary republic. The Socialist Party of the Regions and the Communist Party changed positions and joined a coalition composed of the Party of the Regions and the Communist Party. The opposition leader, Viktor Yanukovych, was appointed Prime Minister of Ukraine and this time he was given more power, compared to the time of the Orange Revolution. The foreign policy implications were crucial for Ukraine as well as neighboring countries that were post-communist such as Russia and Poland. The revolutionary changes would simply reveal a deviation of the ruling parties, leadership and population from the pro-Russian orientation. orientation which would represent a step towards a pro-Western life orientation of their foreign policy (Arel, 168). This would particularly affect the North Atlantic Treaty Association, NATO. The ideology of NATO membership would only divide the country for both the United States and Russia. Interestingly, the Orange Revolution produced evolutionary changes in political institutions, parties, leadership, as well as values ​​that held Ukraine back. Instead, the revolution was composed of rapid changes that varied the broad range and fundamental changes that are called evolution. This was thought to be a slow and complex system of political change. Evolutionary change lay between revolutionary transformation and political stagnation. The main hypothesis for this work is that the Orange Revolution produced the evolutionary changes. These changes have taken place in the political institutions, parties, leadership and values ​​that apply in Ukraine. The evolutionary changes associated with the Orange Revolution lie between revolutionary transformation and political stagnation. The evolution was revealed by political reforms in the nation. It can be said that the causes of the Orange Revolution were the explosion of public opinion due to the presidential elections in 2004. Compatriots in this period were impatient and waiting for the transformation in the political and economic areas of their country. However, the election was thought to have been fraudulent and motivated the death of the events that occurred there before (Kissinger, Henry 105). The Ukrainian regime that ruled before the Orange Revolution led the way in creating a path that would facilitate the emergence of democratic society. This was based on the competitive authoritarian regime, which was seen as a hybrid regime, as it allowed for democracy and the economic health of the economy. The fraud found in the elections placed more emphasis on citizens to have a more pluralistic government. This would obviously increase the public's desire to create a social reform movement. This was only intended to undermine the people's respect for Kuchma as president, which included both the elite and the ruling class. The Orange movement focuses mainly on the change of power, on changes in political institutions; parties, leadership and attitudes in Ukraine. This study uses election poll data, opinion poll data, daily review of major Ukrainian and Western news sources on politics in Ukraine. The study also includes BBC news and field research before, during and after the November 2004 presidential election (Arel, 199). It also uses data from the political crisis that occurred in 2007, especially during the early parliamentary elections that were used to bring about revolutionary or evolutionary changes in Ukraine. The article focuses on the most important sectors,as the political institutions that experienced the impact, before and after the Orange Revolution, the orientation, behavior and background of the main leaders of the Orange Revolution together with the opposition. The third issue addresses changes in national support for major political parties since the 2002 parliamentary elections. The fourth issue addressed by the question is the change in national support experienced since major presidential elections.candidates since the 2004 presidential elections. At the end of 2002, Viktor Yushchenko, Petro Symonenko, Oleksandr Moroz and Yulia Tymoshenko issued a joint statement in which they were concerned about the state of development of Ukraine. The Communists withdrew from the alliance that had been formed and Syomonenko opposed an aspirant who was part of the team running for the presidential elections in Ukraine in 2004 (Kuzio, Taras 243). The other three aspirants, however, remained close friends. In the fall of 2001, Yushchenko and Tymoshenko made an agreement according to which they would create an alliance. Yulia Tymoshenko and Our Ukraine formed a coalition called People's Force, whose main goal was to stop the process that seemed destructive due to the incumbent power. authority and became part of Ukraine (Kissinger, Henry 123). In 2004, the presidential elections featured two candidates, Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych, largely supported by the outgoing president, Kuchma, and the opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko. He was the leader of the Ukrainian faction in the Ukrainian parliament and was a former prime minister in the past. The elections took place in a very charged and intense atmosphere. Yanukovych's team and even the outgoing president's administration used government control and state structures to intimidate Yushchenko's supporters. Furthermore, in 2004, Yushchenko was poisoned under unclear circumstances (Kuzio, Taras 253). However, he survived and returned to his campaigns, but the poisoning undermined his health and he dramatically appeared in public. However, his face has remained disfigured to this day due to the poisoning. Kuchma's behavior was tainted with scandal and he lost many supporters and even high-ranking positions in the government. The numerous government officials who were on his side fully supported Yushchenko's election and his ideas in the electoral process. Due to the lack of faith on the part of the Ukrainian people, Yuschenko's role was never important to the revolution, even though he was a charismatic aspirant who showed no signs of corruption (Arel, 206). He presented his ideas for the nation in a non-Soviet way and was on the same level as his voters. The younger generations who voted in that period were very important in determining the outcome of the 2004 presidential elections. However, they had a different perspective towards the main Ukrainian government figures they wanted. They experienced a lot of negativity from Kuchma and therefore had very distorted views about Kuchma's ability to lead the country for a longer period. The large population of young people who participated in the vote showed a huge sense of nationalism and therefore expressed very different ideas about how to develop their country. The Orange Revolution had enough influence to impact people of all ages. Orange was initially adopted by Yushchenko's activists and was seen as the significant color that would be used for his election campaigns. Subsequently the color gave its name to all documents that were to be used in the political sphere by his political supporters and also by the field (Kissinger, Henry 105). As mass protests grew, they.