Topic > Gender diversity should be included in Nobel Prize nomination

The Nobel Prize was first introduced in the will written by Alfred Nobel in 1895. Most of the Nobel estate was to be set aside as a presentation fund of the most prestigious awards award for outstanding achievement in the world. The Nobel Prize is made up of several categories. The Nobel Prize for chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, peace and, later in 1969, economic sciences. Personally, I agree that a growing voice for gender diversity is included in the Nobel Prize nomination. The vice-president of the Nobel Foundation said: “Consider this a request to all our dominators that all prizes consider women scientists who have made important contributions. Please." This is proof that gender diversity is taken into great consideration. Furthermore, since 1901, the Fields Medal has only been awarded to a woman in 2014. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why shouldn't violent video games be banned"? Get an original essay Furthermore, the Abel Prize has never been awarded to a woman. Furthermore, only one woman has ever won in chemistry. In recent years, as more and more people become more tech savvy, everyone's social life has increased to some extent. Therefore, if the Nobel Prizes do not show changes in the nomination system, its reputation will suffer. However, part of the reason why women are mostly not nominated is due to the time many discoveries are revealed had been verified and validated – before an award could be awarded – at the time there was greater prejudice against women. Even 20 or 30 years ago there were simply too few female scientists. Furthermore, in the past, women were not chosen to represent such prestigious awards due to stereotypes. This shows where most of the lack of gender diversity originated from. On the contrary, it is a fact that the committee does not have the freedom to simply decide the winners. They must consider the opinions of all the dominators present around the world. It's not a problem that can simply be solved simply by giving voice. On the other hand, studies show that systemic biases have not changed due to the lack of progress made during 2017, when there were no female winners for 2 consecutive years. Additionally, the Nobel Prize honors research conducted in the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s, where gender biases were more evident, meaning that as time goes by, more female winners will emerge. This is reflected in the awards given to younger candidates, so the gender distribution is more even. Furthermore, the vice-president of the Nobel Foundation also said that they will increase efforts to identify leading female scientists and will heavily reconsider ethnic and geographical diversity. Additionally, a conference with several awards committees was held in 2017 due to the lack of female winners to address the issue. The vice president also personally hopes that within 5-10 years everything can change for the better. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay In conclusion, I personally largely agree that there is a growing voice for Nobel committees to consider gender diversity in addition to quality of work. However there are other clues, such as the 2017.