IndexIntroductionHome Depot Case AnalysisConclusionReferencesIntroductionDiscrimination is a pervasive problem that transcends geographic boundaries, impacting various aspects of society, including the workplace. The purpose of this discussion is to explore the transformative role that Home Depot has played in reshaping our perspective on discrimination, particularly in the context of hiring practices. In response to a number of complaints, Home Depot devised a solution that sought to redefine the evaluation of qualifications and skills, while decreasing the influence of physical appearance through the strategic integration of technology. As technology now permeates every aspect of our lives, it becomes imperative to reflect on how this tool can revolutionize the hiring processes of large companies, such as Home Depot. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Home Depot Case Analysis Given Home Depot's claim that it merely filled positions based on applicants' preferences, we must critically evaluate whether the company can be found guilty of discrimination in light of the principles outlined in relevant chapter. Home Depot, the largest home improvement retailer in the United States, boasts a workforce of more than 413,000 employees and annual earnings of more than $8.6 billion. However, this industry giant grapples with issues of discrimination within its organizational fabric, stemming from the nature of its work, which has historically tended towards male-dominated roles. While Home Depot's businesses primarily revolve around do-it-yourself projects and labor-intensive tasks, the prevailing ethos in the modern age holds that women are equally, if not more, qualified for such positions. The allegations against Home Depot revolved around the claim that women were predominantly placed in cashier positions, while their male colleagues secured roles in home repair positions. These women said their applications for home repair positions were overlooked based on their gender. In light of the information presented in this chapter and the specific case of Home Depot, one is inclined to conclude that Home Depot is indeed guilty of engaging in discriminatory practices. The company's tendency to hire a majority of male employees for home repair jobs despite the presence of equally qualified female candidates is indicative of disparate treatment, defined as "the differential treatment of similarly situated individuals based on characteristics such as color, religion , sex, national origin, age, race, or disability status." The company's failure to consider minority representation, particularly in terms of gender and race, strengthens the charge of discrimination. This situation is further highlighted by the clear underrepresentation of women in customer service positions, where they were predominantly assigned as cashiers. Despite the possibility that women may possess greater experience related to cashier roles, developing a well-rounded skill set and the potential to excel in various positions within an organization is critical. Therefore, the rejection of women for positions in the home repair industry, for which they exhibited the required qualifications, illustrates a clear example of discrimination rooted in gender and racial prejudices. This scenario is by no means unique, as instances of racism and sexism continue to plague workplaces,.," 3(1), 32-46