In this essay we will delve deeper into the issue; “Should we try to preserve endangered cultures and their languages?” we will look at the arguments for and against and how these are influenced. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay An endangered culture is practices, ideas and customs of people in society that are starting to die out because it is losing its believers, new traditions and practices introduced, this causes cultures to be dying out and together the languages ​​that these cultures use would also become extinct. Examples of these are the ancient traditional Welsh words, the traditional rainforest tribes, the Inuksuit of north-west Greenland,2 the Vilyui Sakha, the indigenous horse and cattle herders of the Vilyui River region of north-eastern Siberia.3 Some of the arguments in favor of preserving endangered cultures and their languages ​​are: they somehow preserve our past and keep us connected to our ancestors, their cultures are their beliefs and are what cause those people in cultures belong to each other, it is said that the cultures they follow are dying and they feel that by losing this they also lose part of their identity. Some of the arguments against are: they are out of date in a modern world, the language used by endangered cultures is unnecessary in a world that has its own major languages, for example Old Welsh, our wildlife and our environment they are much more important to preserve than endangered cultures. The first FOR the preservation of endangered cultures is that cultures allow people to protect their homes even if they are an isolated group. For example, nature.com states: “A small, isolated group of humans without a vote or voice is as good for conservation as an endangered species. A country like Ecuador has everything to gain by protecting both intact ecosystems and cultures through non-intervention policies similar to those used for endangered species.”4 This means that they help each other to protect their home and its environment. through protest or if they live in the wild, like traditional rainforest tribes, making it known that they live there and that the land should not be harmed. This is for the preservation of endangered cultures because cultures bring people together by creating a community, but also give them a common goal such as protecting rainforests or each other. The first AGAINST preserving endangered cultures is that endangered cultures are ill-equipped for the modern world. For example, tropical rainforest cultures would be ill-equipped for the modern world because they live in the rainforest, they have not grown up within society and therefore live a very isolated life and grow old without knowing the modern world, meaning they have an idea of ​​all the new discoveries such as drugs and advanced technologies, for example cell phones, computers, iPads, speakers. This makes them incapable of joining the modern world, as if the rainforests end up being completely destroyed by man due to their energetic plagues, they would be incapacitated for this because they would not understand this technology and would not be able to function alongside it. The second FOR the preservation of endangered cultures is that it unites people, this is shown in Tom Belt's story about his tribe's language not being taught to younger generations and the fact that he is a minority among hispeople who can speak Cherokee, this language brought him and his wife together because she was shocked when they met that he knew the language and could speak it clearly she had told him 20 years ago "the thing that attracted her about me was that I was the Youngest Cherokee he had ever met" never met anyone who could speak Cherokee." This shows that even someone of his own culture sees Cherokee as a language that is not spoken thus making Tom realize that he was only one of the 400 people left to speak Cherokee in the eastern band of the tribe. So far, people who speak that language are under death threats and this is not the only language threatened by this. “In the last century alone, about 400 languages ​​– about one every three months – have become extinct, and most linguists estimate that 50% of the world's remaining 6,500 languages ​​will disappear by the end of this century (some believe this figure is the highest). like 90%, however). Today, the world's top ten languages ​​represent approximately half of the world's population. Is it possible to preserve linguistic diversity or are we on our way to becoming a monolingual species?” but also at least “100 worldwide have only a handful of speakers”, this varies “from Ainu in Japan to Yagna in Chile”. These people can also be difficult to find due to their scarcity in numbers. In some famous cases like "Marie Smith Jones died in Alaska in 2008, taking the Eyak language with her," however, these are usually older individuals who do not advertise their language skills. The second AGAINST preserving endangered cultures is that there is no point in trying to preserve a language where the younger generation that comes from that culture/language speaking prefers a more popular language like English. An example of this would be that the Pitkern speakers of the Pitcairn Islands and Norfolk Islands in the South Pacific have only 500 speakers of it, the rest of the people are more interested in speaking other languages ​​such as: "Younger speakers always prefer more English, and many of them are moving to New Zealand or other English-speaking places. Even the small Pitkern-language version of Wikipedia has been proposed for closure twice." This shows that more and more people do not want to keep their cultural languages ​​in circulation, so why should we try to preserve them if those who practice them do not wish to keep them alive in their daily lives because they are more interested in more diverse things? popular languages ​​around. However, some linguists believe that losing a language is like losing a species, for example "linguist James Crawford says "when languages ​​die the world loses four big things: linguistic diversity, intellectual diversity, cultural diversity and cultural identity. ""The third FOR the preservation of endangered cultures and their languages ​​is because language is an important part of society, this is because it allows people to communicate and express themselves with others. For a person to be able to express themselves is an important side because it makes them who they are and without a language it is easier for an endangered culture to become extinct. According to the United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization “from facts published in their “Atlas of Languages ​​in Danger of Disappearing”, there are approximately 6,000 languages ​​spoken worldwide today, and half of the world's population speaks the eight most common . And 3,000 languages ​​are spoken by fewer than 10,000 people.” The ways that have been suggested to help prevent this extinction of languages ​​is by teaching the younger generations as they grow up so that they grow up speaking this language and are therefore encouraged to maintain their traditions and their language and end.