The films "Why We Fight" and "Japan's Color War" are very different from each other due to the objectivity of the films . The way these two films present themselves give an idea of ​​the purpose these films were trying to achieve. The film “Why We Fight” was commissioned by the Department of Morality and was intended to explain America's involvement in Asia. The purpose of the film is obviously to maintain and gain support for the war effort on the American continent. The film is aimed at American citizens living in places like Atlanta, Georgia, Washington DC or Portland, Oregon. The film “Japan's Color War” offers an analytical approach to the various causes of war in Asia. The goal of this film is to provide a more accurate portrayal of the causes and effects of war in Asia. This film is aimed at scholars of this area of ​​history. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The first contrast that needs to be made between these two films is the nature of their narrators. It appears that in the movie "Why We Fight", the entire dialogue is composed of what appears to be an American male voice. When the narrator is interrupted, he is in place of an American source, for example the Chinese ambassador talks about the Japanese occupation in China. Even when the American ambassador speaks, he seems to be reading permitted cues. Now this is done on purpose to make the United States a hero as much as possible. Even the use of a male voice is designed to evoke feelings of honor and duty. Now in the other film “Japan's Color War” different perspectives are given, which are in turn spoken in Japanese dialect. Both sides are shown, such as small pockets of rebellion against Japan's military emperor, and even hard-line Japanese militarist testimonies. What makes it special is that there is little room for prejudice, as both sides are shown in equal proportions. Now this is done simply because that is how academia, evaluation and detective work works. What then needs to be highlighted is what kind of footage is shown between the two films. I couldn't help but get the feeling that military demonstrations were the central part of the movie "Why We Fight." Then, strangely, some scenes seem to be taken from Hollywood films, especially when they describe ancient Chinese culture. One scene depicting the Great Wall of China, footage of men on horseback in what looked like steppe bandits, felt very much like a Hollywood cliché. But the excessive use of military demonstrations, marches, soldiers storming trenches, close-ups of Japanese soldiers looking threatening is done with the goal of making the US look like a hero compared to the Japanese. The portrayal of the Chinese also makes it seem like they are the responsibility of the United States. The use of degradation is placed on the Chinese, meaning they are given no representation other than the narrator's view of them, and makes it seem like they cannot help themselves from the Japanese forces. The footage from the film “Japan's War in Color” is extremely different from “Why We Fight”. First, shots of typical Japanese life are shown, such as people working in the fields, shots of Tokyo on a normal day, shots of various festivals. The footage attempts to encapsulate the entire human experience in 1930s and early 1940s Asia. Indeed, there is war footage, but in this film it is sometimes difficult to distinguish who is hurting whom. The war is described as messy.