IntroductionIt is a common expression in popular culture that there are things that change a man forever; things from which a man can never return the same person. The expression is meant to warn people about the complicated nature of revenge and vigilantism. Two authors in a text philosophize whether the Dark Night should definitively end the reign of the Prince of Chaos through murder. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This article will use the arguments contained herein to determine whether it is appropriate to avenge the murder and torture of your relatives by killing the perpetrator. The document argues that one should not take full responsibility for avenging the crime, rather leave it to the authorities as they are best placed to conduct such acts. Model citizens should be law abiding (Moncada). That said, the idea of ​​taking the law into their own hands should be foreign to them as it exposes them to the same treatment legally guaranteed to the original offender. Should Batman kill the Joker in the text? , the authors argue that, according to three philosophical positions, the joker could be killed or handed over to the authorities by Batman. According to utilitarianism, killing the Joker would have ideal results since the number of lives saved would be greater than those doomed by that decision. However, the other two philosophical positions oppose this belief (White and Arp). The ethics, for example, does not diminish the importance of punishing the Joker but rather states that it is not up to Batman to carry out the punishment. The position holds that the State is best suited to punish the Joker. The final school of thought, value ethics, prefers to look at the effect of vigilantism on the character of the offender. As stated above, the text provides philosophical foundations for both courses of action. According to the authors, while there are “good reasons to kill the Joker, in terms of innocent lives saved, there are also good reasons not to kill him, based on what killing him would mean for Batman and his motivations, mission and character. ”The choice quote is relevant to determining the right course of action if a serial killer is arrested after killing his family for fun (White and Arp). This is because there are equally good reasons to execute the serial killer because such an action would eliminate the humanity from a psychopath who might engage in future murders. However, personally killing the attacker would mean that the avenger would stoop to the same level of cruelty that the attacker lives in. It would invariably tarnish a person's character by rendering him incapable of taking the moral high road. Both this article and the main text state the importance of punishing individuals who threaten to send civilized people back to the Middle Ages (Rosenbaum and Sederberg). However, both works argue that it is not up to the individual citizen to pronounce the verdict and inflict the punishment. The document therefore takes a stand against vigilantism, although it recognizes the importance of involving citizens in correcting offenders. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion Vigilantism and personal revenge should not be endorsed by society or the state as both lead to actions that threaten the very law that protects all citizens. People who have been victims of abusive criminals should let the State take charge”..”