Due to the existence of many stereotypes in the world, individuals residing in the suburbs always have the mentality that if the poor move to the same neighborhood as the rich, they will bring with them various issues such as drugs, violence and gangs. Such fears are simple stereotypes and more often than not; they are simply false. Heart attack, the issue of neighborhood segregation is another form of racial segregation that is exerting some pain in the heart of the community and society at large. This has led to problems where some people argue that your neighborhood determines who you are while others oppose this theory. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This essay will try to explain the reasons why some people support the claim and why others do not. It will provide examples of cases where people's lives have been affected by their neighborhood. It will also try to explain how one would be the same or different if they grew up elsewhere. We will then conclude with an argument for or against the idea of ​​suburbs following laws that require them to amend the zoning ordinances that govern them to create affordable housing. In the article “Here Comes the Neighborhood,” Professor David L. Kirp argues that the neighborhood has the power to determine who a person is. He states that if houses in the suburbs are subsidized, it means that their affordability has increased and this affects those at the top of the economic pyramid who live in the same areas. In his article, Professor Kirp recounts an incident in Mount Laurel where affordable housing was built. This gave an opportunity to the poor to start over and build a life here which brought several changes in their lives. Similar incidences have been noted in nearby suburbs of the same city. He points out that during this period, the crime rate has reduced and the value of property in this area has increased. In another case, when the value of the houses was high, the exact antithesis of the situation where the value of the property decreased was noted. The poor who took this opportunity were able to transform their lives, so the new environment they lived in changed their lives and changed who they were. Some people are forced to reside in cities, a neighborhood filled with various forms of crime, violence, drugs and other moral issues. These people are extremely sensitive to these issues (Matthew, Reeves & Rodrigue, 2017). This, however, refers to the neighborhood in which they live and can never be changed. It simply means that this neighborhood will have an impact on the people who live there that would be very different from the impact that a suburban area free of such problems would have on the same people if they changed location. There are several factors that support the idea that your neighborhood determines who you are, the kinds of decisions you make, and the choices you make in society. Professor Kip in his work states that those who secured homes in subsidized suburbs confessed to living in a peaceful and quiet world while those who had no chance of securing residence in these areas remained in areas beset by violence. On the other hand, critics have arisen to challenge the idea that one's neighborhood can shape the person one becomes. They argue that the neighborhood does not exclusively possess this power. Despite the fact that it has some minimal effect especially on the schools children enroll in and the quality and quantity of peace a family gets, some people choose to live a high-quality life but don't want to workhard enough to afford it. a residence in an upscale neighborhood (Matthew, Reeves & Rodrigue, 2017). Other individuals are born into families that can never afford a residence in an expensive neighborhood, but never let this case create a definition of who they are. It is possible for individuals to be successful if they work hard regardless of the area in which they live. Michael Gonchar in his article on how much the neighborhood affects someone, states that many people, both poor and rich, are moving to suburban residences because the areas seem to have better conditions. schools, less violence and better jobs. In his work, Gonchar states that the article does not explicitly state what suburbs are. In his opinion, the article refers to the suburbs as a place of residence for the lucky ones, which is not the case. A suburb in his opinion is a place of mixed residences as part of the city or urban center or an independent inhabited community that is within commuting distance from the city. Golcher says he believes the area you live in does not define who you are. As long as you have the resources you need to succeed, the person you become is defined by the people you associate with and how they carry you. Likewise, the idea that where one lives defines who that person is. considered invalid because some individuals choose to spend their money on experiences rather than on great assumptions that would allow them to afford a good house in a good neighborhood. In this sense, some people feel that they would rather reside in a small house in a less ideal neighborhood than miss the opportunity to travel and explore the world. In this sense, the time spent exploring different cultures, looking at the world from different perspectives, and observing how other states work are the experiences that define a person. Is it possible for individuals to be dissimilar if raised in a different place than that? where were they born from? Well, every time a person moves to a different place, they tend to have a new beginning. Due to the skeptical nature of people when it comes to new ventures, it is always necessary to try something just to be sure of what it brings. Being in a different place may not change someone, but the element of a new beginning is always inevitable, as illustrated in the case of Mount Laurel. The main issue is not the neighborhood nor the individuals but the dimension in which society sees the poor. These people are pressured to act in specific ways, which in return forces them to live according to this pressure and beliefs. The poor in society are not going away and this may to some extent affect the people living in these areas. The life one leads is somehow shaped by his neighborhood to a small extent. However, there are many more factors that help shape an individual than simply thinking that neighborhood is the sole determinant of who a person is. Therefore, being born in a completely different area would mean that this new neighborhood would slightly define a person and therefore other factors such as; the people you surround yourself with, the existence of the resources necessary to succeed and the willingness to work hard come into play to integrate and cover the parts that the neighborhood would never have covered. Should suburbs be mandated to rewrite their zoning laws? Very often, most people have moved to the suburbs because they see the place as an area where, in addition to affordable housing, their children can attend better schools, get good jobs, get good healthcare services and be free from the crimes of urban centers. Both rich and poor have considered.